Obama to replace Napoleon

Even before he got elected as the US president, Chayakada had given its verdict – this man is so plastic. When he portrayed himself as a black man who is white enough to be in the White House… we knew what he is going to deliver.

Last week, Washington Post carried an article: Obama backs non-censorship; Beijing, apparently, does not.

President Obama, taking questions Monday from government-selected students at a town hall-style meeting in Shanghai, called himself “a big supporter of non-censorship.” But the Beijing government, apparently, is not, and most Chinese never got to hear or read what Obama said.

Telegraph in the UK wrote: Barack Obama has strongly criticised censorship in an unusual live “town hall” meeting with Chinese students in Shanghai, veering directly into one of the most sensitive areas of Communist party policy.

The Hope evangelist put up a big show in China; after all those Red Commis in China are all about censorship, stealing American jobs, etc etc….

Back in his own country, land of the free, land of undying hope… Obama is no different from the Chinese regime. Obama enforces censorship in the USA!

If Orwell was around, he would definitely change the names of a few characters in Animal Farm. Napoleon is a sure candidate to be replaced by Obama.

A Nobel he never won.

Many people actually believe RK Pachauri won a Nobel Prize for Peace. It is highly possible that the committee might give him a Nobel Prize for Climate (if they come up with a category like that).

On the website of Festival Of Thinkers, organised by Higher Colleges of Technology, UAE, you will find this.

The Nobel Peace Prize site makes it very clear who won the prize.

The Hindu Kills With Its Editorial

The Hindu has published an editorial “Brinjal and beyond.”

Did N Ram the Editor of The Hindu write these words:
“He (India’s environment minister) should ignore the huge pressure from organisations that have no time for the scientific evidence while claiming to speak for the environment and the public.”

The editor is saying Greenpeace has no time for scientific evidence!

Did the editor at least try to get in touch with Professor Gilles-Eric Seralini of the Committee for Independent Research and Information on Genetic Engineering (CRIIGEN) – who called Bt Brinjal: Bt Brinjal Unfit for Human Consumption.